Rates on small saving schemes to be reduced by 50-75 basis points: Govt

It is very rare you get to see an advertisement of small saving schemes but then also more people invest in these schemes in comparison to bank deposits the reason being the interest given on these schemes and savings plans are tax free. But now these schemes won’t be as attractive as government is planning to reduce the rates on small savings scheme by 50-75 basis points to increase the bank deposits. Earlier in 2003 the rate was reduced by 100 basis points to the current eight percent. Government is thinking of setting up a committee headed by the former governor of RBI which will study the issues and recommend appropriate steps.

Analysts point out that in case the banks slash the deposit rates beyond a certain limit, then investors can get diverted towards small saving scheme. Therefore banks are abstaining from cut in the deposit rates. The industry experts say the reduction in deposit rates might not help in cut down of the lending rates also.

Some of the major small saving schemes are National Saving Certificates, Post Office Savings Account, Public Provident Fund, Kisan Vikas Patra, and Senior Citizen Savings Scheme. These saving schemes are in competition with the bank deposits as they have tax benefits under Section 80 C of the Income Tax Act.

Forum directed ABN AMRO bank to compensate for wrongly billing

The ABN AMRO bank has been directed by the district consumer forum bench comprising president TN Vaidya and member Rajesh Kumar to pay compensation and litigation costs worth Rs 6,000 for wrongly billing a resident, thus causing an undue harassment to the complainant.

The complainant Kanwal Khurana in his complaint alleged that he had opened a current account and got a credit card from ABN AMRO Bank by paying Rs 22,412 for using the credit card vide demand draft dated May 30, 2006. On 16.6.2006 the amount was credited to the account of ABN AMRO Bank.

But in spite of this the bank continued charging late payment charges and interest regularly in his statement. He stated in order to settle the matter in cordially manner he made a complaint to the bank on 28-11-2006 then also bank did not take any corrective measures.

The complainant appealed before the forum that the bank should be proceeded under the
the Consumer Protection Act for causing harassment. Bank did not defend its case in the forum therefore it was proceeded ex parte and the forum after hearing the arguments of the counsel for the complainant and scrutinizing the evidence presented by him, apprehended the bank guilty.